ADVANCED RESEARCH METHOD IN CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
Keywords:
Advanced, Research, Methodologies, Climate Change, Environment, sustainabilityAbstract
This paper explores advanced research methodologies employed in the study of climate changeand environmental sustainability. It examines qualitative, quantitative, and “mixed-methods” approaches, emphasizing their applications in climate science. Qualitative methods such as case studies, interviews, and content analysis provide insights into human perceptions, policy frameworks, and socio-economic impacts of climate change (Creswell &Poth, 2018). Quantitative techniques, include statistical modeling, remote sensing, and climate simulations, which enable empirical assessments of environmental changes and future projections (IPCC, 2021). The integration of mixed-methods research, such as participatory action research and integrated assessment models, bridges the gap between scientific data and real-world applications (Cameron, 2014). The idea behind this term paper is to exposit these traditional methods mentioned and other emerging technologies, like big data analytics, machine learning, citizen science, and blockchain, which could be applied in revolutionizing climate research by enhancing predictive capabilities, transparency, and stakeholder participation (Rolnick et al., 2019; van der Aalst, 2018). The paper also addresses ethical considerations, including data privacy, equity, and the inclusion of marginalized communities in sustainability studies (Hulme, 2009). Furthermore, interdisciplinary integration is emphasized as a key challenge in developing holistic climate change solutions (O’Brien et al., 2013). By synthesizing traditional and cutting-edge research methodologies, this study provides a comprehensive framework for advancing climate science and promoting effective environmental sustainability strategies.
References
Agrawal, A. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the politics of classification. International Social Science Journal, 54(173), 287-297.
Anderson, P. A., & Brown, H. S. (2020). Scaling Up Climate Solutions: The Role of Governance and Policy Innovation. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1123-1135.
Cameron, J. (2014). Mixed Methods Research in Climate Change Adaptation: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Climate Policy, 14(3), 339-355
Clark, W. C., van Kerkhoff, L., Lebel, L., &Gallopin, G. C. (2016). Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4570-4578.
Creswell, J. W., &Poth, C. N. (2018).Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches.SAGE Publications.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K.E. (2019). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 12(12), 187- 241.
Ghil, M., et al. (2017). Climate Change: Complexity, Uncertainty, and Risk. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 22(5), 1-20.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., &Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning.MIT Press.
Hecker, S., et al. (2018). Citizen Science: A Tool for Sustainability in Environmental Research. Sustainability, 10(11), 4115. DOI: 10.3390/su10114115.
Hulme, M. (2009).Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity.Cambridge University Press.Link to the book
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis.Cambridge University Press.Link to the report
Lemos, M. C., &Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297-325.
Molnar, C. (2020). Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0.
NASA.(2020). Earth observation for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/
O’Brien, K., St. Clair, A. L., &Kristoffersen, B. (2013).Climate Change, Ethics, and Human Security.Cambridge University Press.
Pindyck, R. S. (2013). Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(3), 860-872.
Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D. C., Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Cambridge University Press.
Ribeiro, M. T., et al. (2016). Why Should I Trust You? Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(pp. 1135-1144). DOI: 10.1145/2939672.2939778.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472-475.
Rolnick, D., et al. (2019). Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05433.
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., et al.(2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
The Earth System Governance Project. (2020). Global Sustainability: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Available at: www.earthsystemgovernance.org.
The Global Carbon Project.(2022). Annual Global Carbon Budget Report. Available at: www.globalcarbonproject.org.
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2018). Process Mining: Data Science in Action. Springer.
Voinov, A., et al. (2016). Participatory Modeling, Collaborative Planning, and Community-Based Decision Support in Environmental Management. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 21(5), 673-686. DOI: 10.1007/s10666-016-9510-4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IPHO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
