Association between Recovery Status and Performance among Male Players in the Northwest Regional Football League of Cameroon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23451655Keywords:
recovery status, Hooper Index, performance, wellness, fatigue, Northwest Regional Football League, CameroonAbstract
This study examined the association between recovery status and performance among male players in the Northwest Regional Football League of Cameroon. The study addressed the second objective of a broader investigation of training adaptations and player performance and combined quantitative and qualitative evidence. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used. The sampling frame comprised 30 teams organised into four pools; two pools were selected by ballot, two teams were purposively selected from each selected pool, and all eligible players in the four participating teams were enumerated. The quantitative sample comprised 114 male players from Rising Star FA (n=25), SAMISA FA (n=31), SIMAF FA (n=23), and ACHICO FA (n=35), while four head coaches participated in semi-structured interviews. Recovery status was assessed with the Hooper Recovery Index, covering sleep quality, fatigue, stress and muscle soreness, and performance was assessed using the performance measures adopted in the broader study. Quantitative data were analysed with frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, Pearson product-moment correlation and simple linear regression; coach interviews were analysed thematically. The overall Hooper Index was 12.82 ± 7.69. Although 49.1% of players were classified as having excellent recovery, 49.2% were classified as having poor or very poor recovery and 1.7% having good, demonstrating substantial inter-individual variation. Recovery status was significantly and inversely associated with performance (r = ?.624, p < .001). The regression model was statistically significant, F(1,112) = 71.49, p < .001, and recovery status accounted for 39.0% of the observed variance in performance (R² = .390; adjusted R² = .384). Coach interviews indicated that rest, sleep, hydration, nutrition, stretching and light recovery activities were commonly used, whereas formal recovery programmes and advanced modalities were limited. The findings indicate that poorer recovery status is associated with lower player performance in this regional football context. However, because recovery interventions were not experimentally assigned and players were nested within four teams, the findings were interpreted as associational and predictive rather than causal. Routine monitoring of sleep, fatigue, stress and muscle soreness, combined with context-appropriate recovery planning, may assist coaches in managing player readiness.
References
Nédélec M, McCall A, Carling C, Legall F, Berthoin S, Dupont G. Recovery in soccer: Part I-Post-match fatigue and time course of recovery. Sports Medicine. 2012;42(12):997-1015. doi:10.2165/11635270-000000000-00000.
Nédélec M, McCall A, Carling C, Legall F, Berthoin S, Dupont G. Recovery in soccer: Part II-Recovery strategies. Sports Medicine. 2013;43(1):9-22. doi:10.1007/s40279-012-0002-0.
Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Medicine. 2014;44(Suppl 2):S139-S147. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z.
Hooper SL, Mackinnon LT. Monitoring overtraining in athletes: Recommendations. Sports Medicine. 1995;20(5):321-327. doi:10.2165/00007256-199520050-00003.
Altarriba-Bartes A, Peña J, Vicens-Bordas J, Milà-Villaroel R, Calleja-González J. Post-competition recovery strategies in elite male soccer players: Effects on performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240135. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240135.
Haller N, Hübler E, Stöggl T, Simon P. Evidence-based recovery in soccer-Low-effort approaches for practitioners. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2022;82:75–99. doi:10.2478/hukin-2022-0082.
Oliveira RFS, Canário-Lemos R, Peixoto R, Vilaça-Alves J, Morgans R, Brito JP. The relationship between wellness and training and match load in professional male soccer players. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(7):e0289374. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289374.
Kellmann M, Bertollo M, Bosquet L, Brink M, Coutts AJ, Duffield R, et al. Recovery and performance in sport: Consensus statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2018;13(2):240-245. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0759.
Hooper SL, Mackinnon LT, Howard A, Gordon RD, Bachmann AW. Markers for monitoring overtraining and recovery. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1995;27(1):106-112.
Kellmann M. Enhancing recovery: Preventing underperformance in athletes. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2002.
Altarriba-Bartes A, Peña J, Vicens-Bordas J, Milà-Villaroel R, Calleja-González J. Evidence-based recovery in soccer-Low-effort approaches with high potential. Frontiers in Physiology. 2022;13:946599.
Montgomery PG, Pyne DB, Hopkins WG, Dorman JC, Cook K, Minahan CL. The effect of recovery strategies on physical performance and cumulative fatigue in competitive basketball. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2008;26(11):1135-1145.
Mika A, Mika P, Fernhall B, Unnithan VB. Comparison of recovery strategies on muscle performance after fatiguing exercise. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2007;86(6):474-481.
Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, Fry A, Gleeson M, Nieman D, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: Joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2013;45(1):186-205.
Bompa TO, Buzzichelli C. Periodization: Theory and methodology of training. 6th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IPHO-Journal of Advance Research in Games and Sports

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
