THE POSITIVE FUNCTIONS OF TRADE SECRETS: INNOVATION, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, AND EXTERNAL ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY IN THE CONTEXT OF 80 FIELDS OF APPLICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17855255Keywords:
Trade Secret, Innovation, Competitive Advantage, External Economic Diplomacy, Corporate Knowledge ManagementAbstract
This study examines the positive functions of trade secrets in the dimensions of innovation, competitive advantage, and external economic diplomacy within the context of eighty different application areas. In the knowledge-based structure of the global economy, trade secrets emerge as a fundamental legal and economic instrument that enables enterprises to gain competitive advantage by protecting their distinctive knowledge assets. The central research question addresses through which mechanisms trade secret protection strengthens innovation processes, enterprises' competitive capacity, and countries' external economic diplomacy effectiveness. The study hypothesizes that trade secret protection increases innovation capacity by encouraging research and development investments, consolidates competitive strength by supporting enterprises' differentiation strategies, and enhances external economic diplomacy effectiveness by establishing a reliable foundation for international cooperation. Designed as an analytical view article, this study presents a descriptive and analytical framework through a qualitative research approach. An interdisciplinary perspective has been constructed by integrating Schumpeter's creative destruction theory, Porter's competitive advantage theory, resource dependency theory, and institutional theory. The findings demonstrate that trade secret protection generates multi-layered effects extending from the micro level to the macro level, performing positive functions across a broad spectrum from small and medium-sized enterprises to multinational corporations, from supply chains to sectoral clusters. The research reveals that the concept of trade secrets is not merely a confidentiality mechanism but a determining variable in shaping economic development strategies, corporate governance practices, and international relations. The study provides actionable recommendations for innovation policies, competition law regulations, and external economic diplomacy strategies.
References
Almada-Lobo, F. (2016). The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of manufacturing. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(4), 16–21.
Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–625). Princeton University Press.
Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2006). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford University Press.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Toward a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.
BEIS — Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. (2021). The economic and innovation impacts of trade secrets. UK Government.
BEIS. (2021). UK innovation strategy: Leading the future by creating it. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bowen, G. A., & Rose, S. (2020). Document analysis in social research. Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carapeto, R. (2025). Exploring the junction of public national security and private economic interests: Trade secrets. In R. Carapeto (Ed.), Exploring the junction of public national security and private economic interests. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Routledge.
Cuntz, A., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence and intellectual property: An economic perspective. World Intellectual Property Organization.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2016). On the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure. Official Journal of the European Union.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
European Commission. (2013). SMEs and intellectual property. Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission. (2013). Survey on trade secrets and confidential business information in the internal market. European Commission, DG Internal Market.
European Commission. (2018). The scale and impact of industrial espionage and theft of trade secrets through cyber. Publications Office of the European Union.
European IP Helpdesk. (2021). Trade secrets: A practical guide for SMEs.
European Union Intellectual Property Office. (2017). Protecting innovation through trade secrets and patents: Determinants for European Union firms. EUIPO.
EUIPO — European Union Intellectual Property Office. (2016). Protecting innovation through trade secrets and patents: Determinants for European Union firms. EUIPO Observatory.
EUIPO. (2017). Trade secrets litigation trends in the EU. European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Friedman, D. D., Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1991). Some economics of trade secret law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 61–72.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. SAGE Publications.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown.
Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). Clarifying the domain of corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 774–786.
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 783–831.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Linton, J. D. (2016). Perspectives on innovation and intellectual property management. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 1–12.
Linton, K. (2016). The unexpected importance of trade secrets: New directions in international trade policy making and empirical research. East-West Center.
Linton, K. (2016). The unexpected importance of trade secrets: New directions in international trade policy making and empirical research. In The economic and innovation impacts of trade secrets (pp. 1–22). UK Government.
Linton, K. (2016). Trade secrets and international competitiveness. U.S. International Trade Commission Office of Economics.
Lippoldt, D. C., & Schultz, S. (2014). Uncovering trade secrets: An empirical assessment of economic implications of protection for undisclosed data (OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 167). OECD Publishing.
Lippoldt, D., & Schultz, M. (2014). Trade secrets protection and innovation performance: Evidence from firm-level data. OECD Publishing.
Marx, M., Strumsky, D., & Fleming, L. (2009). Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Science, 55(6), 875–889.
Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Institute for International Economics.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC). (2018). Foreign economic espionage in cyberspace. Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
OECD. (2015). Intellectual property and innovation: The role of trade secrets. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). Trade secrets: Empirical evidence and policy implications. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2023. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Enquiries into intellectual property’s economic impact. OECD Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.
Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. SAGE Publications.
Punch, K. F. (2006). Developing effective research proposals (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Radauer, A., Bader, M., Aplin, T., et al. (2022). Study on the legal protection of trade secrets in the context of the data economy. European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency.
Radauer, A., Streicher, J., & Ohler, F. (2022). Trade secrets and cyber security: Firm-level strategies in the digital age. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(4), 711–732.
Radauer, A., Streicher, J., & Ohler, F. (2022). Cybersecurity and trade secrets management in the digital age. European Commission.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage.
Searle, N. (2021). The economic and innovation impacts of trade secrets. UK Intellectual Property Office.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Mixed methods (pp. 77–100). SAGE Publications.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
UNCTAD. (2020). World investment report 2020: International production beyond the pandemic. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). WIPO guide to trade secrets and innovation. WIPO.
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2023). WIPO guide to trade secrets and innovation. WIPO.
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). WTO.
WTO (World Trade Organization). (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). In The legal texts: The results of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations. WTO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 IPHO-Journal of Advance Research in Applied Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IPHO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.






